quake ^.^
*crait
*mailas
Puncharger wrote:Never really got hooked on them.
The little I played was kinda good though.
DarkPacMan77 wrote:Running Quake on my computer makes me feel a little too 1996, but the core mechanics that make up the game are still pretty timeless and offer room for expansion.
-DarkPacMan77-
logistic wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Running Quake on my computer makes me feel a little too 1996, but the core mechanics that make up the game are still pretty timeless and offer room for expansion.
-DarkPacMan77-
haha. i love quake graphics. theyre not HORRIBLE, but there not the greatest. i loved early 2000s gaming, dude.
D3ViLsAdvocate wrote:Try shaking the salt harder onto your tongue.
DarkPacMan77 wrote:logistic wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Running Quake on my computer makes me feel a little too 1996, but the core mechanics that make up the game are still pretty timeless and offer room for expansion.
-DarkPacMan77-
haha. i love quake graphics. theyre not HORRIBLE, but there not the greatest. i loved early 2000s gaming, dude.
Which is great, for your needs, because that's just about all that Linux can run anyways
-DarkPacMan77-
DarkPacMan77 wrote:logistic wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Running Quake on my computer makes me feel a little too 1996, but the core mechanics that make up the game are still pretty timeless and offer room for expansion.
-DarkPacMan77-
haha. i love quake graphics. theyre not HORRIBLE, but there not the greatest. i loved early 2000s gaming, dude.
Which is great, for your needs, because that's just about all that Linux can run anyways
-DarkPacMan77-
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests